Tips on telecaster / pickups combo

Hi guys, since I’m guessing everyone here is a fan of telecasters I wanted to ask a question about telecaster / pickup combinations.

I’m looking for something that can give me that amazing telecaster blues / jazz sound, but can still hold its own fairly distorted.

Any ideas would be great.

Thom

2 Likes

Hi Thom,

I have two telecasters that I upgraded with Lollar pickups, I absolutely get why Lollar has a loyal following. I put a Charlie Christian in the neck of one and a set of Vintage T’s in the other. The CC is an amazing pickup, it’s warm but not muddy, great mids but still has a bit of pop or spank that you’d expect from a Tele. It is perfect for Jazz or Blues. If you push them and they get nice and dirty but do not lose clarity. Tim Lerch has a few great videos on YouTube where he showcases the CC on a Tele. On my other Tele I find the Lollar’s Vintage T’s, capture that classic Tele sound, twang and spank, but can also be sweet and warm. I find they have more presence than stock Fender pups, but nail “that Tele sound”.

3 Likes

+1 for the classic Lollar tele pickups. I have a new Nash with those and they sound phenomenal for pretty much anything you would think to try with a Tele

1 Like

To add my two cents, I agree that the Lollars are great. I also have them in a Nash that I’ve enjoyed for years. They do the classic Tele thing really well and you can’t miss if you go Lollar.

That said, as I’ve played a wider range of Teles and listened more closely to Tele tones on records, I have found myself occasionally wanting a tone that has a bit less highs, a bit more mids (especially low mids) and maybe a touch more compression than I get with the Lollars. Sometimes you can get this the lollars there just by dialing in your amp appropriately, but I’ve found that on very chimey amps (Vox and Vox-inspired amps), or low volume Fenders before you get any real saturation, they can still sound a bit more “stringy” and “twangy” than I want, when I’m looking for punch with bite.

These nuances are all luxury problems, but I thought I’d share the thoughts either way in case they are helpful. If you go with the lollars you won’t be disappointed!

1 Like

Interesting thoughts, Thankyou.

Did you ever find anything that gave you the low mids or did you just stick to amp settings?

1 Like

I picked up a Suhr Tele on a trade and I’m trying that right now, but I still have my Nash loaded with lollars. The Suhr pickups definitely have more body, and I find them easier to use across a range of styles. I don’t connect with the Suhr guitar style as much as I do my Nash, so I’ll likely trade it again for more vintage-style Tele, but it’s a closer step toward the tone I’m looking for.

Pickups I’m looking at long-term are those from Arcane, and perhaps Ron Ellis (although those can be quite expensive), and Fralins. No final decisions though, and the lollars still get plenty of use.

3 Likes

To throw another option in the mix of you want more mids - look at the Fralin Steel Pole 43, they are like a P90 in a standard telecaster pu, they also make the Steel Pole 42 it’s like a blend of classic Tele tone with a P90.

2 Likes

I have Cavalier PUs in my Fender 2019 Broadcaster reissue: ( https://www.frettech.com/) and I love them. I have a Lion King in the neck and a Nocaster in the bridge and love it. Site offers many videos of players using combinations of PUs here: (Cavalier Guitar & Bass Pickups). Much more effective than the short sound clips like the ones Lollar and Fralin uses. Rob DiStefano is great and will answer any question you have. A pair of hand wound high quality PUs are about $150 shipped to your door in a few days. Definitely worth looking at IMHO. Good luck.

1 Like